When did the supreme court start talking about privacy on phones? United States, when the court essentially said the opposite. "The justices had phones [by 1967], and they knew that they talked about their most private stuff on those phones," says Jennifer Stisa Granick, director of civil liberties at the Stanford Center for Internet and Society.Should the government get a warrant for cellphone location data? United States, ruling that the government must get a warrant before accessing a person’s sensitive cellphone location data. Carpenter, which the ACLU argued before the Supreme Court, concerned information revealing where Timothy Carpenter had traveled with his phone.Are cell phone location records protected by the fourth amendment? The opinion states: Given the unique nature of cell phone location records, the fact that the information is held by a third party does not by itself overcome the user’s claim to Fourth Amendment protection … we hold that an inpidual maintains a legitimate expectation of privacy in the record of his physical movements as captured through CSLI.Do cell phones hold privacies of life in california? California (134 S.Ct. 2473 (2014)) substantially raises the privacy bar for the search of a modern cell phone. The court agreed with Brown on the Supreme Court’s point that, for many Americans, cell phones hold “the privacies of life,” including Grandma’s phone number and Brown’s dreadlock photo.
Before the Supreme Court, Carpenter asserts that disclosure of his cell phone records was a “search” requiring a warrant. Two Supreme Court cases from the 1970s are at the center of arguments